About Me

Name: Amanda Sablan
Location: Bonaire, GA
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Calling All Intellectuals: Sarah, You Sit Down

Let's just get these things straight, shall we? Sarah Palin is not an intellectual. She's no genius at anything, be it history, culture, or politics. She doesn't have a Harvard degree, and, let's face it: Palin's got that weird Western accent. What a turn-off, some would say.
 
As much as I love her, she's just not cut out to become the person that Barack Obama is, an intellectual, a rare breed of man who can dazzle all but the dimmest of people. Our President-elect has got so many factoids in that ginormous brain of his that one must wonder how it doesn't burst? I mean really, how does he get around without falling over? There's just so much to brag about! Did you know that Obama can recite the Romanian alphabet . . . backwards?! Have you seen that guy give a speech on public policy? Man, so many details! And so precise, there's not a single grammatical error to be heard. Not since Jimmy Carter did the United States have such a smartie in the White House.
 
But you know what? I don't care, and neither should you. The highest office in the land doesn't dictate that you can name every Supreme Court case in history, or even a few. It doesn't require that you speak, act, and talk like your everyday politician, because LEADERS such as Sarah Palin have done just fine without it. Owing to all the rallies and interviews I've see her in (except for the disastrous Katie Couric one) Sarah has shown that she is capable and highly well-versed on the issues, as any other politician. Note how quickly she responds, and how logical her answers are liable to be. She does not resort to petty tactics to achieve results; rather, she refuses to get bitter and fights on, smiling all the while and projecting an almost constant image of leadership even after the most vicious remarks have come her way. This is a woman who knows what she's talking about (you can see it in her determination), a woman with excellent judgment and common sense not held back by naiveness. She is compassionate, inspiring, tough, self-deprecating, and supremely confident, and those qualities are what I search for in a potential President. Certainly intelligence and experience are important factors as well, but Sarah Palin has already assured me that she can handle just about anything the world throws at her, because she has the smarts and the steadily growing experience. How else could you explain the AK governor's envious approval ratings, some of which have soared to 92% in the past? How else would you sum up her tremendous record? How else could she have held her own against the Senate veteran Joe Biden at the VP Debates? To put it simply, you betcha she must be doing something right up there, and that something belongs in the White House one day.
 
And to all you "perfect" people out there, I'm sorry to say that even your precious Messiah has his moments. He's made some questionable comments too along with everybody else. Remember the infamous, "I've campaigned in 57 states" line? An instant classic. Or how about, "My middle name will help me in foreign affairs because it will make other countries think I have a bushy mustache." He believes that the homogenous country of China is "full of black people" and that he once received a treasure map from Long John Silvers (you know, the seafood restaurant). The list goes on and on. And yet do you see me calling him a jackass? No, because he's not. He's an "intellectual," remember? So if Obama is considered smart, then so too should Palin.
 
It is downright SHAMEFUL how the liberal media has reported on every one of of her gaffes but not Obama's. They constantly deride the most watched news station in America (Fox News) for supposedly being "biased" and "hate-spewing" (even though numerous non-partisan studies have confirmed otherwise) and yet there they go salivating over Obama while criticising Palin. I could be wrong about this, but it seems to me that whenever Obama is about ready to say something dumb, arrogant, reckless, or all of the above, liberal idealists unconsciously tune out as a result of some sort of brain defect. Again, I could be wrong.
 
All this is not to say I'm picking on "intellectuals" (obviously it's pretty cool if you know so much), but the point that I'm trying to make is that having a high IQ does not guarantee you a successful Presidency. Rather than your RUN-OF-THE-MILL POLITICIAN who is out for himself, America needs insightful LEADERS to guide us into peace and prosperity. The primary function of our President is to enforce national law for the good of the country. Since when does getting a law degree help?
 
Sarah Palin has proven herself to be that leader. Ask any Alaskan, whether Democrat or Republican, and the vast majority of them will tell you some good things. Maybe she wasn't ready this year to help lead the country with John McCain, but you can bet your bottom dollar she'll at least win the Republican nomination in 2012. Until then, let's hope our soon-to-be Prez luck.
 
He's gonna need it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reality Check For Race-Sensitive Liberals

There is nothing that grinds my gears more than a race-sensitive liberal, the kind of loon who believes that racism is as prevalent in our society as it was back in the 50's, before Martin Luther King JR brought us together - for the most part, anyway - and united blacks and whites. Reverends such as Jesse Jackson and "US of KKKA" Wright are crazily reminiscient about that time, almost to the point where one must wonder if they'd prefer pre-MLKJr? They claim to be the champions of racial equality and black rights, spouting such crap as "it's the whites who hold us back!" when really it's people like them, the race-sensitive liberals, who are at fault with their false accusations that the white man is of the utmost evil. For once, I wish they'd just shut their mouths and actually listen to Bill Cosby.

It is intensely irritating when some (note the emphasis) liberals attribute 46% of the country who voted for John McCain to racism, as if we were thinking, "Oh Gee, lookie there, it's a Negro. Better endorse the old guy or we'll all end up with Aunt Jamama Holding a Drumstick as our national symbol." Self-righteous hypocrits like Roseanne Barr and Jonathan Alter are in desperate need of a newsflash, and here it is:

Supporters of the McCain/Palin ticket voted against Obama NOT because of the color of his skin or funny name (he could be called Baracko Bin Laden for all I care about names!) but because of his LIBERAL POLICIES! His QUESTIONABLE character! His BAD affiliations! His even WORSE Judgment! While there are certainly still racists in this country, there is not nearly as many to impact a Presidential race. Personally, I LOVE that we have a black President, and I am excited at making history; Obama's just not the one I had in mind to do it.

In order for the GOP to get back on track and attract new voters, we don't need just the younger folk, we need a considerable portion of blacks and Hispanics! Evidence suggests that by 2040, they may very well be the MAJORITY population of the US, rather than whites, and we cannot keep allowing the Democrats to recruit them. The so-called "Party for Minorities" is a lie. There are just as many Repubs as Dems who crave racial equality, because AMERICANS in general want it. How else would you explain the fact that 52% of the country is in love with our President-elect? Unfortunately, some blacks and Hispanics, at least the ones not held back because they agree with liberal views and policies (Prop 8, anyone?) are at prey here. As I've just mentioned, the Proposition banning gay marriage in the blue state of California further reiterates that even though minorites mostly voted for Democrat Obama, they still have conservative values at heart, and many embrace things like pro-lifeism and a strong, traditionally-bound family. And let's not forget that it was the Republican Party, led by Republican Abraham Lincoln, that abolished slavery. Chew on that, Sharpton.

So if we're going to reclaim a majority in government, we MUST prove to people that we CAN offer up oppurtunity, rather than hand-outs, and we DO care as much as any Democrat about race relations. We MUST finds ways to build a minority base and bring those crucial voters to our side, the RIGHT side. If we can do that, no more losing elections.

I can already see Barack Obama giving his concession speech in 2012 . . .

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »